Kung Lao or Liu Kang

[blade]

Originally Posted by Rain

Kung Lao is better in my opinion.. He is strong, his kicks just rock.. He has a Hat with a blade on it lol..

With me on it :D

[Lui_Kang_HERO]

if this was "who is more powerfull" then liu would have won easly,unless everyone's ignorant about the "storyline"(did that to anger rain ^_^)

but i must admit,the hat's cool,but it's nothing that's more powerfull than a sword.

[kombatant_mark_anthony]

Originally Posted by MKRayden

MK Conquest Kung Lao is Great Kung Lao and it's different then gaming kung lao but however overall kung lao is popular then liu kang

Wouldn't history repeat itself since it is a 1000 later Kung Lao and wouldn't his other friends also be along side him in 1000 later tournament that Kung Lao entered.

[Noob Gus]

I vote Kung Lao he has a very original fighting style based on his famous hat and violent fatalities.

[LK765]

liu kang man. Who was the starring character for 5 games?

[kombatant_mark_anthony]

Originally Posted by LK765

liu kang man. Who was the starring character for 5 games?

Who would have been the starring character for 5 games?
My answer would be Kung Lao.

Which characters would have teamed up to verse Outworld?
My answer would be Kung Lao and Lui Kang.

So bascially if there was no Kung Lao there would be no Lui Kang. If Lui Kang did exist so would Kung Lao.

[MKRayden]

Originally Posted by LK765

liu kang man. Who was the starring character for 5 games?

i think it's 4 mk games

[LK765]

Originally Posted by MKRayden

i think it's 4 mk games

MK1-4 and shaolin monks which is basically MK II re-imagined.

[Rain]

IMO Main Character (Main Hero) Concept is bad for Fighting games.. All the endings of each characters should lead to the Canon story would be a better concept.. If you guys have played Assassin's Creed II and know about the Truth video.. you collect 20 something fragments of a clip.. once all are collected after goin through various puzzles you unlock the final video.. It should be the same for MK.. Finish the game with all characters and unlock a short movie.. IMO.. Otherwise everyone has a different ending..

[Lui_Kang_HERO]

Originally Posted by Rain

IMO Main Character (Main Hero) Concept is bad for Fighting games.. All the endings of each characters should lead to the Canon story would be a better concept.. If you guys have played Assassin's Creed II and know about the Truth video.. you collect 20 something fragments of a clip.. once all are collected after goin through various puzzles you unlock the final video.. It should be the same for MK.. Finish the game with all characters and unlock a short movie.. IMO.. Otherwise everyone has a different ending..

i disagree with the main charectar part becouse they need to do it,a succesfull storyline would always have a good vs evil clash,a hero vs villian final battle,everyone is a supportive charectar exept 2,the hero and the villian,without liu kang,shang tsung,shao kahn and shinnok there would be no mk1,mk2,mk3 or mk4,they have gotten the highest role,shang tsung,shao kahn and shinnok being the main threats and liu kang being the one to defeat them,the same goes for shujinko,onaga,taven and daegon.

as for the endings,i agree 100%,we should stop having what if endings and the endings would show what accually happens to the charectar during the mk game,storyline would be complicated and f***ed up at first but after unlocking every ending the connections would make perfect sense and the unlocked clip would explain explain other unknown stuff and present the main threat of the next game.